Anti-fascists are Psychopaths. Left-wing Politically Correct Psychosis

Daily Bale

Why are left-wing anti-fascists Psychopaths?

Amazing new revelation – 99.8% of left-wing sickos are ‘Psychos’

First a bit of terminological history, to clear up any confusion about the meanings of “sociopath,” “psychopath,” and “left-wing sicko” related terms.

In the early 1800s, doctors who worked with mental patients began to notice that some of their patients who appeared outwardly normal had what they termed a “moral depravity” or “moral insanity,” in that they seemed to possess no sense of ethics or the rights of freedom of speech of other people and they all predominantly held left-wing views.

The term “psychopath” was first applied to these people around 1900, and the term “left-wing sicko” came into existence with the emergence of the anti-fascist movements and organisations.

Daily Bale

The term “left-wing sicko” is used today more so by the more sane and logical thinking Nationalist opponents of the left-wing sickos and the left-wing politically correct perverts in whatever form the sickos have latched on to and identify themselves as being at the time, usually this is within anti-fascist movements or some other weird movement trying to present some kind of moral meaning for it’s existence and to try to convince vulnerable people that if they join these movements “you will be a good person and feel good about yourself”.

This usually entails the left-wing sickos trying to lay claim to some form of moral sounding foundation and making out that they are ‘standing up’ for a minority or some other ‘victim’ of nasty white people, and without even asking that particular minority they say they ‘stand up’ for if they actually want these left-wing sickos patronising them the way they obviously do.

This is nothing more than the left-wing so called anti-fascists using minorities as a ‘tool’ for their own particular left-wing political agenda and trying to force their own will by intimidation, manipulation and bullying using political correctness as a buzz word to enforce their ideology.

Quite simply, this is blatant left-wing fascism and racism in its full projection.

The left-wing then project their own hatred and racism from themselves onto others who do not happen to agree with left-wing anti-fascist Marxist politically correct fascist communist ideology.

The left-wing then call anybody who disagrees with them  ‘racists’ and ‘fascists’ – but obviously the fascism and racism is fully apparent within the anti-fascists themselves.


The term psychopath was changed to “sociopath” in the 1930s to emphasize the damage they do to society.

Currently researchers have returned to using the term “psychopath” and the normal layman is now using the term “left-wing sicko”

Characteristics of a Marxist left-wing anti-fascist politically correct sicko 

Some of us use the term “sicko” to refer to a more serious disorder, linked to genetic traits, producing more dangerous individuals, while continuing to use “sociopath” to refer to less dangerous people who are seen more as products of their environment, including their upbringing, which is still really very appropriate for descriptive terms concerning the left-wing anti-fascist Marxist sicko.

Other researchers make a distinction between “primary psychopaths,” who are thought to be genetically caused, and “secondary psychopaths,” seen as more a product of their environments, but again, all very appropriate for the left-wing brainwashed politically correct anti-fascist sickos.

The current approach to defining sociopathy and the related concepts is to use a list of criteria. The first such list was developed by Hervey Cleckley (1941), who is known as the first person to describe the condition in detail. Anyone fitting enough of these criteria counts as a psychopath or sociopath. There are several such lists in use.

The most commonly used is called the Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R), developed by Robert Hare and his colleagues. An alternative version was developed in 1996 by Lilienfeld and Andrews, called the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI).

The book that psychologists and psychiatrists use to categorize and diagnose mental illness, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (DSM IV) contains a category for something called “antisocial personality disorder” (APD), while the World Health Organization delineates a similar category it calls “dissocial personality disorder.”

These are much broader categories than that of psychopathy. The category of psychopath is seen as included within this category but considerably smaller so that only roughly 1 in 5 people with APD is a psychopath, but it is widely suspected that up to 99.8% of left-wing anti-fascists are psychopathic sickos.

If we overlay all of these lists of criteria, we can see them coalescing into the following core set:

Most common traits of a Marxist left-wing anti-fascist politically correct sicko


The PCL describes psychopaths as being callous and showing a lack of empathy, traits which the PPI describes as “coldheartedness.”

The criteria for dissocial personality disorder include a “callous unconcern for the feelings of others.” There are now several lines of evidence that point to the biological grounding for the uncaring nature of the psychopath. For us, caring is a largely emotion-driven enterprise.

The brains of psycopaths have been found to have weak connections among the components of the brain’s emotional systems. These disconnects are responsible for the psychopath’s inability to feel emotions deeply. Psychopaths are also not good at detecting fear in the faces of other people (Blair et al., 2004).

The emotion of disgust also plays an important role on our ethical sense. We find certain types of unethical actions disgusting, and this work to keep us from engaging in them and makes us express disapproval of them. But psychopaths have extremely high thresholds for disgust, as measured by their reactions when shown disgusting photos of mutilated faces and when exposed to foul odors.

One promising new line of research is based on the recent discovery of a brain network responsible for understanding the minds of others. Called the default mode network (because it also performs other tasks and is operating most of the time when we are awake) it involves a cluster of several different areas in the brain’s cortex.

The first studies have been done on function of this network in psychopaths and as expected there are problems there. Different studies have noted “aberrant functional connectivity” among the parts of the network, along with reduced volume in some of the networks crucial areas.

Shallow emotions

Psychopaths, and to a degree, sociopaths, show a lack of emotion, especially the social emotions, such as shame, guilt, and embarrassment. Cleckley said that the psychopaths he came into contact with showed a “general poverty in major affective reactions,” and a “lack of remorse or shame.”

The PCL describes psychopaths as “emotionally shallow” and showing a lack of guilt. Psychopaths are notorious for their lack of fear.

When normal people are put into an experimental situation where they anticipate that something painful will happen, such as a mild electric shock, or a mildly aversive pressure applied to a limb, a brain network activates.

Normal people will also show a clear skin conductance response produced by sweat gland activity. In psychopathic subjects, however, this brain network showed no activity and no skin conductance responses were emitted (Birbaumer et al., 2012).


According to Cleckley psychopaths show unreliability, while the PCL mentions “irresponsibility” and the PPI describes psychopaths as showing “blame externalization,” i.e. they blame others for events that are actually their fault.

They may admit blame when forced into a corner, but these admissions are not accompanied by a sense of shame or remorse, and they have no power to change the sociopath’s future behavior.

Insincere speech

Ranging from what the PCL describes as “glibness” and “superficial charm” to Cleckley’s “untruthfulness” and “insincerity,” to outright “pathological lying,” there is a trend toward devaluing speech among psychopaths by inflating and distorting it toward selfish ends.

The criteria for APD include “conning others for personal profit or pleasure.”

One concerned father of a young sociopathic woman said, “I can’t understand the girl, no matter how hard I try. “It’s not that she seems bad or exactly that she means to do wrong.

She can lie with the straightest face, and after she’s found in the most outlandish lies she still seems perfectly easy in her own mind”

This casual use of words may be attributable to what some researchers call a shallow sense of word meaning. Psychopaths do not show a differential brain response to emotional terms over neutral terms that normal people do (Williamson et al., 1991). They also have trouble understanding metaphors and abstract words.


The PCL describes sociopaths as possessing a “grandiose sense of self worth.” Cleckley speaks frequently of the boastfulness of his patients. Hare (1993) describes an imprisoned sociopath who believed he was a world class swimmer.

Narrowing of attention

According to Newman and his colleagues the core deficit in psychopathy is a failure of what they call response modulation (Hiatt and Newman, 2006). When normal people engage in a task we are able to alter our activity, or modulate our responses, depending on relevant peripheral information that appears after the task has begun.

Psychopaths are specifically deficient in this ability, and according to Newman, this explains the impulsivity of psychopaths, a trait which shows up in several of the lists of criteria, as well as their problems with passive avoidance and with processing emotions.

Top-down attention tends to be under voluntary control, whereas bottom-up attention happens involuntarily. But bottom-up attention can temporarily capture top-down attention, as when movement in the periphery of our visual field attracts our attention.

Psychopaths have trouble using top-down attention to accomodate information that activates bottom-up attention during a task. In normal people, this process tends to happen automatically.

When the hunter is scanning for deer, a rabbit hopping into the periphery of his visual field automatically attracts his attention. Top-down attentional processes monitor the field of attention for conflicts and resolve them. The standard task for assessing this is called the Stroop task, in which the subject must state which color words are printed in.

The problem is that the words themselves are conflicting color words, such as “red” printed in blue ink, so the subjects must suppress a strong inclination to read the words.

There are now several studies indicating that psychopaths actually perform better than normal people on these tasks perhaps because they are not distracted by the discrepant color (Hiatt et al., 2004; Newman et al., 1997).


Cleckley spoke of his psychopaths showing a “pathologic egocentricity [and incapacity forlove],” which is affirmed in the PPI by its inclusion of egocentricity among its criteria. The PCL also mentions a “parasitic lifestyle.”

Inability to plan for the future

Cleckley said that his psychopaths showed a “failure to follow any life plan.” According to the PCL, psychopaths have a “lack of realistic long-term goals,” while the PPI describes them as showing a “carefree nonplanness.”


The criteria for dissocial personality include, a “very low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for discharge of aggression, including violence.”

The criteria for antisocial personality disorder include, “irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults.”

Philosophers can play a valuable role here in discerning the consequences of all of these findings for our attempts to build an ethical society.

Several questions need addressing.

What does the possibility that psychopathy is genetic say about human nature? What steps can we take to “correct” psychopaths and which of these is the most ethical?

If it is true that psychopaths have damaged or abnormal brains, can we hold them responsible for what they do? Are there degrees of psychopathy, so that normal people may possess psychopathic traits?

Left-wing Racists and Fascists. Anti-fascist Left-wing politically Correct Cranks

Daily Bale

The Genocidal Racism of Left-Wing Extremists.
with many thanks to the great Paul Weston.

“I have had some interesting discussions with extreme left-wingers recently.

And oh boy, what a dreadful lot of immoral, dangerous racists they are!

These online conversations are always initiated by the leftists, who promptly accuse me of racism, bigotry and Islamophobia. I reply that I am not driven by a dislike, or even hatred of foreigners, but that I love my country, its culture, its people and its inherent decency, all of which I see threatened by an ever-growing number of immigrant people who share few of our moderate ideals.

This sparks off more accusations of racism, but I then ask the following question:

“You tell me British Colonialism was wrong, yet you have no problem with Britain being colonised. This tells me it is not colonialism that bothers you, but the existence of traditional Britain. Is this the case?”

The leftist reply to this is that Britain committed all sorts of atrocities in the past, and it is now retribution time. I then ask them if they carry this same view over to other forms of colonialism.

For example, the Zulus ethnically cleansed the Hottentot from Southern Africa, so based on leftist logic was it not a morally just form of retribution when the Zulus in turn were subjugated by the British and the Dutch?

If the leftist considers this was not morally just, was it purely because the British and Dutch colonisers were white?

Leftists don’t really like this argument. They have difficulty answering the question because in their own peculiar world view, tribal racism simply does not exist when non-whites are the guilty party.

Only whites can be guilty and only whites must suffer retribution. This is, of course, pure anti-white racism writ large.

When the African-American feminist Bonnie Greer appeared on the BBC’s Question Time a couple of years ago, she declared there was no such entity as the “Indigenous English.”

This is a terribly racist statement to make, and is just the sort of rhetoric Hitler used against the Jews when he sought to de-legitimise them. Greer was allowed to get away with this, naturally, because the BBC is in broad agreement with such racist ideology.

So the next question I ask the leftist is this:

“Do you agree that all indigenous people, regardless of their skin colour, have a legal and moral right to their traditional existence and to their homeland?”

The leftist will then tell me that all people are entitled to such a basic requirement, except for white Europeans who are historically guilty of murder, oppression, slavery, etc etc.

My penultimate question to them is this:

“Demographics predict the native British will become an ethnic minority in their own homeland before 2050. Do you agree this is direct contravention of the UN’s Definition of Genocide; in direct contravention of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; and in direct contravention of any real world definition of decency and morality?”

The leftist will reply there is no such thing as the Indigenous British. Britain is an immigrant nation anyway, and is all the better for it. He tells me the world is One World and all are welcome. To resist this is racist, they say.

My final question is this:

“So, you deny the existence of the English/Scottish/Welsh/Irish as legally and morally recognised races; you deny them their right to a nationality and a culture; you deny them their right to remain as an ethnic majority in the land of their birth, and you deny them the right to their homeland?”

By this stage, the leftist is so furious that I have forced him into a corner, and so furious that I have questioned his morality (which he feels he possesses but I do not) that he then injudiciously replies:

“No, you have no rights to any of these things because of your historical actions, and you’re now getting everything you f******g well deserve.”

And that is where we are now. The Left still accuse us of racism because we wish to preserve the people, culture and homeland which our forefathers sacrificed so much for, yet the Left cannot recognise their own overt racism when they speak quite literally of racial genocide.

Make no mistake about this: These leftists are not morally good people; they are dangerous, evil genocidal racists, driven by an absolutely insane racial hatred of their very own race.

The Left is our primary enemy”


Left-wing Anti-fascist Jobless Anti-British Marxists Encourage African Migrants

Daily Bale

Left-wing anti-fascist politically correct weirdos are directly to blame for Machete-wielding migrants who threaten the lives of British truckers and who want to get into the U.K to milk the system and live a cosy life on benefits.

Left-wing anti-fascist jobless Benefit scroungers who have nothing better to do and who are angry that Labour did not win the last Election because they wanted more Benefits paid for by hard working decent patriotic Brits, have been encouraging migrants to come to Britain to get what they can.

Left-wing Marxists and politically correct anti-fascist freaks want to flood Britain with migrants and to make us pay for not voting Loony Labour in the last Election.

We must now push strongly to ban these left-wing anti-fascist anti-British Marxist organisations and arrest the ringleaders.


Left-wing anti-fascist anti-British weirdos demonstrate for open borders

The Daily Bale has learnt that British truck drivers have spoken of threats to their lives from migrants holed up in Calais while trying to reach soft-touch Britain.

Also, British born jobless benefit scrounging left-wing anti-fascist Communist Bolshevik beasts and Marxist anti-British monsters have been spotted in Calais, encouraging migrants to head for Britain. 

The disturbing revelations include truckers being threatened at knife-point, beaten with baseball bats, threatened with machetes and having trailers slashed by armed migrant gangs.


While the EU Immigration policy prohibits Britain to secure her borders, the problem is made much worse by the fact that economic migrant hoards choose to pass over numerous European countries to reach Britain, attracted by the last Labour government’s policy of excessive handouts and a privileged status over ordinary Brits.

While French police struggle to deal with the crisis, British truckers have spoken out about the daily trauma and threats to their lives.

The situation has become so serious that some companies are being forced to avoid Calais all together, adding costly miles to journeys.

Calais Migrants

“My mate was threatened by a migrant with a knife and his exact words were, ‘I’ll kill you, I don’t care,’” stated trucker, John Morgue.

The situation is now very dangerous, he continued, “they all carry knives, every one of them.”

Migrants target lorries stacked up on the motorway. They slash side curtains and break open doors to trailers to stow away. One night, John found eight in the back of his trailer.

migrants in calais

Steve Bowkett, 50, added: “The damage they cause is horrendous. Two of them threatened me when I found them in the back of my trailer hiding among the pallets. The job is becoming a nightmare.”

Kevin Hopper, managing director of haulage firm Brain Yardley Continental Ltd said: “It’s just a matter of time before someone is killed.”

“The fear of what is coming gives me sleepless nights. My worst nightmare is getting a call to say one of my drivers has been stabbed or worse. Calais is a battlefield.”

The problem is so bad, exclaimed Mr Hopper, that his bravest drivers, some of whom are ex-Marines, asked if they could re-route to avoid Calais.

“I’ve been in the business for 30 years,” he added, “this is the worst I have ever known. The police just look the other way.”

Daily Bale

The Daily Bale supports British truckers.

While fully in agreement with trucker demonstrations on the ground, the Daily Bale is putting its full weight behind the campaign to take Britain ‘Out of the EU’ in order to regain control of our borders.

Furthermore, the Daily Bale supports an end to ‘soft-touch Britain’ by putting British people first every time and we always report on the left-wing anti-fascist criminals who want to destroy our Country and enslave us under left-wing political correctness and Marxism.

We support strongly, very strict restrictions on claiming benefits, thereby removing the incentive for criminal gangs and migrant hoards to leave their countries and travel hundreds of miles to take advantage of benefits and handouts at the expense of hard-working Brits.

Racist Attack On White Man. Anti-fascist Left-wing Marxists Fuelling Racial Hatred.

Daily Bale

Racist Attack On White Man – Just For Being White.

Left-wing Blogs and Anti-fascist Organisations are totally silent upon this matter.

The general feeling on Social Network is that left-wing political correctness and the so called ‘anti-fascist’ Marxist leftist organisations are encouraging racial tension with their evil sick left-wing propaganda and race hate rhetoric by calling everybody ‘racists’ and ‘fascists’ in order to fuel hatred, division and tension between communities.

There have been more and more calls for the Government to ban these so called ‘anti-fascist’ organisations who use the cover of ‘being seen to be for equality’ but who in actual fact are just extreme far left-wing Marxist organisations who are stoking and fuelling hatred and segregation by continuously accusing white people of being ‘racist’ and ‘fascist’ so that there is more division and hatred and the left-wing anti-fascist organisations gain further foothold amongst the chaos – but it is these very organisations that are causing all the hatred in the first place.

Father-of-two beaten up and left for dead by Asian gang for being white.

A father-of-two was subjected to a racist and brutal attack by a gang of Asian men who targeted him – simply for being white.

Andrew Goodram, 31, suffered a punctured lung and two broken ribs after the gang of four thugs shouted: ‘white b*****d’ at him before subjecting him to a vicious assault.

Victim: Andrew Goodram pictured at the spot in Queens Park where he was attacked

During the assault Mr Goodram, a labourer, was repeatedly kicked in the head, face and body at Queens Park in Bolton, Greater Manchester.

One of his attackers then stood over him and stamped on his chest causing what police described as ‘significant injuries’.

The beating only came to an end when one of the men decided the group should leave and they all ran off in different directions.

Mr Goodram, a father of two managed to stagger home after the assault but had to spend six days in hospital.

Greater Manchester Police yesterday confirmed that the attack, which took place at 7pm on October 19 was being treated as a racially motivated incident.

Mr Goodram who has two sons said: ‘I was in such terrible pain after the attack, I was yelping and my eyes were watering.

‘I’m scared now and when I see groups of Asian people. This attack has changed how I feel about going out.

‘When I’m walking around especially on my own I feel intimidated and worried I might get attacked again.

Worried: Andrew stands on the path where he was assaulted. He now fears being attacked when he is out alone

Worried: Andrew stands on the path where he was assaulted. He now fears being attacked when he is out alone

‘The fact is, I am not racist, I have got loads of Asian friends, and I’m really saddened that this has happened to me.

‘I do believe the attack was racially motivated because I am white but I don’t understand why.

‘I thought we are supposed to live together in peace’.

On the night of the attack, Mr Goodram was taking a shortcut through the park when he encountered four Asian men – who were with four friends.

As he walked past, one said: ‘what did you say you white b*****d’?’ before launching the attack.

Mr Goodram added: ‘I carried on walking and put my hood up and ignored them, but then they jumped me and I was pulled to the ground.

‘They were kicking me and hitting me and one of them twisted my arm behind my back.

‘One of them jumped on me and, when I winced in pain, they ran off.’

Police say the attackers were Asian and aged between 20 and 30. One of the men has been described as in his early 30s, 6 ft 2in, of heavy build, with a bald head and a thin ‘lined’ beard.

He was wearing a dark hooded top with tracksuit bottoms and white NIKE trainers.

Mr Goodram was unable to describe the other members of the group.

A spokesman from Greater Manchester Police said: ‘The victim was walking through the park at about 7pm when he was attacked by a group of Asian men.

‘The man was repeatedly kicked in the head, face and body, one of the men stood over him and stamped on his chest causing significant injuries.

‘Racist abuse was shouted at the man before the attack.

‘One man in the group shouted for them to leave and they all ran off in different directions.

‘A group of four men are wanted for the assault’.

Psychiatrist Says Left-wing and Political Correctness is a Psychological Disorder

Daily Bale

Leading Psychiatrist Says Leftism and Political Correctness is Psychological Disorder

Left-wing sickos clinically mad, concludes top psychiatrist

Eminent doctor makes case that leftist ideology is a mental disorder

Just when left-wing sickos and weirdos thought it was safe to start identifying themselves as even acceptable in some kind of way to the British people – then the majority of the British people voted solidly against left-wing sickism and weirdism and made it quite clear – the British people most certainly ‘do not’ agree with left-wing sick twisted crackpot mentality or left-wing weirdism.


Anti-fascist left-wing Marxist cranks demonstrating against democracy and the right to free speech  

But now even worse for the left-wing cranks and loony tunes, an acclaimed veteran psychiatrist is making the case that the ideology motivating left-wing politically correct sickism and weirdism is actually a mental disorder.

“Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern left-wing sickos relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedom and democracy are based,”

Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, “The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness.

Left-wing weirdism and sickism

“Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.”

While political activists on the sane right-wing side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism or political affiliation to any side.

For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at University.

The kind of left-wing sickism being displayed by leftist freaks can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

“A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as left-wing cranks do dismiss it,”

“A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as left-wing freaks do”

“A legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation’s citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as left-wing weirdos do.”

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

* creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
* satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
* augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
* rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

“The roots of left-wing politically correct sickism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the left-wing sick twisted mind”

“When the modern left-wing warped sick twisted mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the leftist mind becomes painfully obvious.”

Daily Bale

The Daily Bale ran a survey of 500 people, 100 in each of five major Cities within the U.K, the questions were –

1.) ‘do left-wing views hold any meaning for you as an individual’

2.) ‘do left-wing views and/or Political Correctness hold any meaning to you as an individual’

The result of the survey actually caught our survey team off guard with the final result back at Daily Bale headquarters.

99.8% of the 500 people surveyed answered in the negative. (NO)



Open Letter to Daily Bale from Anti-fascist Network Admits Racism and Fascism

Daily Bale

The Daily Bale has been contacted by one of our most despised ideological opposites and a representative of an organisation that the Daily Bale itself believes to be all that is desperately wrong and morally perverse within the U.K at this period of time in our history as a Nation and people.

The people who push this cultural cancer and brain dead nonsensical left-wing lunacy are the very example and core of our founding mission and purpose to expose and reveal for all their sick twisted corrupt, hypocritical, unequal, undemocratic and totally unfair illogical nonsense and garbage.

History itself will judge the Daily Bale in the political climate of future times and the generations to come that have the interest or inclination to look up and look back at what they will then call the ‘turning point’ or the ‘re-awakening’ of common sense and National identity.

But the real ‘enlightenment point’ will not be seen as the emergence of the Daily Bale, or even Daily Bale posts and topics, but rather it’s core message that it carries in it’s own parable form within it’s posts and within it’s very existence as a publication as a whole and in total.

That message is quite simply the one fact that we all know deep down anyway and have always really known within ourselves as individual human beings when we examine and ask ourselves honestly and we do not fall back onto any previous conditioning that may of occurred up until this point in our lives by left-wing politically correct brainwashing.

We all know that Political Correctness is wrong and deeply immoral.

We also know that no matter how much those people who try to justify it and condone it, or those people that condemn others or who revert to labelling innocent people with disgusting names like ‘racist’ and ‘fascist’ to try and bully and intimidate others into following left-wing political correctness will only succeed in bringing more and more hatred and scorn upon themselves by the very people that they tried to indoctrinate with their own hatred to start with.  

All they are doing is trying to convince themselves that what they know to be wrong, is in some way right.

It just will not ever work, and all they are doing is digging themselves a bigger and bigger hole.

The only difference is, the whole Nation can now see very clearly just how very big and how very deep indeed that hole has become.

Below is a communication that was sent to the Daily Bale from a leading figure within the anti-fascist network who we do not choose to reveal, not because they asked us not to, but because we feel that we are furthering our own cause by not showing all our cards before we are ready to do so.

All will become clear in time.

Meanwhile, please read on and learn how even the left-wing anti-fascist so called leading names are now beginning to doubt themselves and agree with our one true message. 

Open Letter to Daily Bale

(If you do choose to publish, then for any future reference, please keep in mind that i do ask that you consider whether revealing the source to be of benefit to you by way of future negotiation and any info i may or may not disclose to you.

It is by way of my own major criticism and of the anti-fascist movement itself that i write this and point out what is really quite bloody obvious anyway, but it troubles me greatly and to that extent i ask that you at least hear me out and trust me on this, that’s all i ask okay ?

Our organisation is dominated by white middle class people, this demographic, and the liberal reformist perspective we offer, alienates those most affected by organised fascist activity not unlike your own as we see it – ethnic minority groups and the white working class.

The result is an isolated, single-issue movement adept at nothing more than ineffectually waving placards.

It just isn’t working anymore, and yes i admit openly to you that the Daily Bale has hit us hard over the last couple of years, but you do have a point here, that is why i am asking you to at least meet us half way and hear us out.

There is a need for anti-fascism to have a radical, working class perspective that addresses the roots of your fascism with a powerful economic argument. But where does race fit into this equation?

Some of us are at least seeing that now.

i won’t say thanks to the Daily Bale, but you were a big part of it and opening one eye, so to speak.

The Fascism that we believe you spout is a divisive movement. The aim is to split apart the working class along any line possible – race, religion, nationality, etc – in order gain influence and power. You play upon fears and concerns.

In order to most effectively fight that division, us anti-fascists need a movement that is not just based in class struggle but one which is as diverse as the working class itself.

There are several reasons why working class people of colour are put off from engaging in anti-fascist activity. All of them need to be addressed and challenged if that situation is to change.

Primary among those reasons is the sheer preponderance of anti-fascist white people and our own hidden racism.

Faced with scenes where, for example, an overwhelmingly white crowd of students sang “we are black, white, Asian, and we’re Jews” at a protest in Liverpool, non-white communities are more often perplexed than encouraged by such obviously racist and patronising action where we are just using race as a tool.

Liberal anti-fascism, as with liberalism in general, proliferates a patronising form of “anti-racism” and “inclusiveness” that seems to demand subservience more than it does equality, and i am ashamed to admit, but we have been more than racist and fascist in our own behaviour and the striving basically for one thing – power.

As an example, look at the society that has emerged under the dominance of liberals eager to promote “multiculturalism.”

In a fascist society, it is true, we would not see black rappers performing sell out tours, gay people camping it up on television, or Muslims defending their faith against criticism, but it would be even worse in a left-wing anti-fascist society, and that could not and would not be allowed in a full Communist society which is our ultimate goal..

But in this liberal society, we do not see black artists who rap about more than girls and guns, offering a radical critique of the dominant culture.

We do not see gay people who reject camp culture and demand true equality over being treated as amusing pets.

We do not see Muslims or Arabs resisting the authoritarianism and patriarchy forced upon them by their mullahs.

Liberalism, whatever its pretences, offers not acceptance and equality, but a begrudging tolerance in hopeful exchange for silent acquiescence.

In place of integration and cooperation we have a segregation of people into supposedly-homogenous “communities” where unelected “community leaders” repay state handouts with votes.

Liberal “multicultualism,” then is a way to divide the working class whilst claiming to promote “diversity.”

With liberal anti-fascism, the principle is roughly the same. By offering a critique of fascist organisations that is not grounded in class struggle but a defence of the status quo and this statist principle of “multiculturalism.”

As such, the liberal anti-fascists offer a very patronising anti-racism to non-white people, but isn’t that all about us anti-fascists in the first place recognising differences in race and it’s us anti-fascists being bloody racist ?

Instead of offering an economic argument that tears down the false racial divides thrown up by the far-right, they will turn them around against the white working class. Instead of grass roots organisation across such artificial lines, they recruit “community leaders,” whose job is to keep their particular “ethnic community” in line in order to cement their own position, and who often represent the same authoritarianism, misogyny, and homophobia that is so loathsome in your lot the far right.

This latter issue is particularly acute amongst the “traditional” left at large, such as the Socialist Workers’ Party (SWP) and George Galloway’s Respect coalition.

They have become apologists for the worst elements of all that is wrong in society, taking on a simplistic version of anti-imperialism which supports groups such as Hamas or the clerical regime in Iran. As they are involved in liberal anti-fascism as much as liberals, Unite Against Fascism (UAF) being an SWP front, this approach coalesces with the “multiculturalist” one.

The result is a movement that promotes social equality whilst ignoring economic equality. One that, with the mainstream trade unions on board, speaks of the working class yet has the highest echelons of established power amongst its benefactors.

In response to these criticisms, those they are aimed at will throw the accusations right back. Talk of class war and socialism puts immigrants and ethnic minorities off, they respond.

In truth, this is yet more patronising nonsense. Socialism and class struggle are hardly white priorities, and to suggest otherwise is to suggest that a different skin pigmentation equates to an entirely different set of concerns and values.

In fact, as already discussed, such patronisation is more off-putting than anything. But if class is in any way a factor in turning non-whites away from anti-fascism, then it will be for the fact that liberal anti-fascism is a predominantly middle-class movement.

Overwhelmingly, those blacks and Asians who do work with UAF, Hope not Hate, or similar factions, are of a fairly privileged background.

Just as it does with white working class people, this turns black and Asian workers away. It is facile to think that a one-dimensional race argument will mobilise people who, on top of this, are facing the same struggles as we do in being a part of the working class.

Removing class and economics from the anti-fascist argument reduces it to a moral position which, as already covered, feels patronising more than empowering.

Moreover, it is another sop to the far-right. In dropping all emphasis on social class, we become the opposite side of their coin, defining people purely by the colour of their skin

Returning to what I said earlier about liberal multiculturalism, one particularly notorious way of splitting anti-fascism into racial blocks is to engage with often self-appointed “community leaders” as a substitute for grass roots community organisation.

As already stated, the effect of this is to create and build upon racial schisms in the working class under the guise of “diversity.” Another consequence is that entire racial groups become defined by the worst traits of their unelected “leader” or “spokesperson.”

As a more obvious example consider Iqbal Sacranie, former leader of the Muslim Council of Britain.

In January 2006, he denounced homosexuality as “not acceptable” and called civil partnerships “harmful.”

Because he was a “community leader,” this was reported not as an individual with distasteful views but as “Muslim head says gays ‘harmful’.”

Through his very status as “leader,” he had transposed this opinion onto every Muslim in Britain.

As “community leaders” are unelected and without an opposition candidate, this leaves ordinary people even more voiceless than they are under parliamentary “democracy,” unable to get their message out if they disagree.

This is somewhat troubling even with a well-meaning spokesperson. When those who claim to speak for their race or religion stand for the worst kind of authoritarianism and bigotry, it is downright dangerous.

Often, anti-fascists walk a tightrope on racial issues. They risk being caught between promoting racial segregation as apologists for values utterly antithetical to their own, and tokenism, condescendingly “allowing” blacks to take part in a “white” movement, as long as they don’t upset the apple cart.

The only way to avoid falling into this trap is to draw the antifascist movement back to the grass roots or just disband it altogether. To put it bluntly, a genuinely diverse anti-fascism cannot emerge within a top-down structure where opposition to racism must fit into a framework of established power.

Combating racial segregation and hatred must mean utterly rejecting the idea of homogenous “communities” and the “leaders” that come with them.

At the same time, however, it must recognise that victims of racism (as victims of capitalism) are not helpless creatures requiring rescue by us white anti-fascist self righteous ones.

We cannot “allow” non-whites to be anti-fascists or “invite” them to join us, as we have no monopoly on the movement as whites ourselves, that is just blatant racism in ourselves as white people, who we mostly are in the anti-fascist movements.

White, middle-class students are not black, Asian, or Jews. They are white.

Segregation is not diversity, even when you call it multiculturalism.

If white people can organise and resist without the go-ahead from a “leader,” then so too can non-white people.

Us anti-fascists have got to stop patronising other races and the bottom line is we must stop being racist ourselves.

We must not only recognise that, but push against those trends. We need open and honest dialogue about the flaws of the anti-fascist movement as it is and how we might fix them.

Most importantly, we must return to the grass roots and ensure that people hear the argument against your type of fascism based upon class, not race, at the moment we have got this all wrong, dreadfully wrong, and it feels like we have misled an awful lot of people in the quest for our own power to be bluntly honest with you.

If we do not change, or refuse to change, then we must disband and give it up. if we don’t do something fast, then anti-fascism will remain a white, middle class movement ineffectually waving placards whilst cordoned off from the fascists by the police, and all the time the fact that nobody realises is that it is us the anti-fascists who are in reality the very real racists and fascists. I do not ask you to sympathise with these sentiments, and i know the Daily Bale will always report us in a negative light whichever way you see it. But i do ask that you at least try to understand that we are trying to do something about it and we are trying to rectify the wrongs that i at least do realise we have missed along the way.