HOPE not hate. Unite Against Fascism. The Shocking Truth Revealed.

Ukip

HOPE not hate. Unite Against Fascism.

The Shocking Truth Revealed.

Hope not hate. Unite Against Fascism. The shocking truth revealed that will cause the Public to question why this is being allowed and in who’s name.

It makes little political sense to argue that UAF and Hope Note are “just the same” or identical.

Yes, we agree that both groups are “toxic” (as posh Leftists say of every critic of Islam and all members of the EDL).

Nonetheless, there are some differences which may be worthwhile to note.

Because of these ideological and strategic differences, it’s no wonder that Trotskyist groups (such as UAF) and communist groups (such as Hope Not Hate) have always been at each other’s throats.

Hope not hate

(In fact rival Trotskyist groups have often been at each other’s throats too.)

For example, the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) is constantly slagging off the SWP.

(Then again, so too is Alliance for Workers’ Liberty – and this group is Trotskyist.)

So it will come as no surprise that UAF-SWP doesn’t have much time for Hope Not Hate.

Take this example – one of many – of a UAF/Hope Not Hate rift.

In this case UAF came clean about its differences with Hope Not Hate (or Searchlight) in a document called ‘Lessons of the 2009 election’, UAF wrote:

There have been many debates over strategy in the anti-fascist movement…The two poles in this debate have been Searchlight, on the one hand, and the UAF, on the other.”

So what are these profound ideological and strategic differences between UAF and Hope Not Hate (Searchlight)?

The said document continued in this manner:

Searchlight walked out of the UAF some years ago, splitting the anti-fascist movement, when it was criticised for making concessions to racism by giving credence to [racist] myths….”

This highlights one of the reasons why UAF, being Trotskyist rather than old-style communist, is far more extreme than Hope Not Hate.

Because Trotskyists believe that “the ends justify the means” (Trotskyists justify this by saying that all their many enemies also believe it – thus the motto itself is justified by the Trotskyist end), and that revolution and radicalisation must be brought about “by any means necessary”

(The black machismo of Malcolm X has always appealed to white, middle-class, effete Leftists), and that “lying for justice” (i.e. Trotskyist taqiyya) is completely acceptable and even encouraged, it will come as no surprise that UAF won’t offer a single criticism of any atrocity or crime committed by a non-British non-white person or persons – ever.

This is quite literally the case for the ideological fundamentalists and zealots who make up UAF.

Quite simply, if you were to talk in any critical way at all about, say, Muslim grooming gangs, or even Islamic terrorists, you would automatically be, by Trotskyist definition or diktat, a “racist” and/or a “fascist”.
This is not a subject for debate, according to UAF.
(Nothing is genuinely debated by UAF and to try and debate with them makes you a racist in their eyes.)
And that is the reason why UAF not only never criticises Muslims or Islamic groups; but also why it always defends or supports them.
Not to do so would be “racist” and/or “fascist; as well as to “side with the state” (to quote the SWP’s now-dead Chris Harman).
Hope not hate
Unless you realise how extreme – literally extreme – UAF is,  you will remain perplexed by what it does and says.

You will simply never understand the perverse alliances it forms and perverse causes it fights for.

Trotskyist zealotry leads inexorably to such perverse and absurd positions/actions.

And, in a certain sense, Trotskyists pride themselves on being extreme because they believe that such extremism (not a word they’d never use about themselves – only others) is precisely what’s required to “smash the state” or to “smash racism and fascism”.

Hope not hate

In other words, fascist actions and views, as well as alliances with brown fascists, is required by Trotskyist groups in order to further revolution (radicalisation) destabilisation or not to “side with the state” – and yet it is believed that they get community grants and are Tax Payer funded.

UAF went in further for the kill in the case of Nick Lowles.

Nick Lowles wrote an an article, in Searchlight, called ‘Tackling Taboo Issues’,  to which UAF responded:

It did not confront racism, and still less, Islamophobia head on in its campaign, instead over some years [of] making concessions to racist myths….”

Here again UAF is parading its Trotskyist purity and extremism.

Again, only by being extreme – and taking extreme views – can “racism”, “fascism”, etc. be “smashed” (a favorite word of the SWP).

Thus any critical comment about any Muslim or black is quite literally racist and/or fascist to UAF – or, at the very least, it’s a “concession to racist myths”.

Trotskyist logic, as ever, is brutally simple.

Hope not hate

Trotskyist groups always take simple and extreme positions on virtually all subjects and this case was no exception.

That crudity and fundamentalism is required for the revolutionary cause. Anything position or analysis with even an ounce of subtlety or complexity would quite simply work against the revolution or against “smashing fascism”.

In response to all this UAF Hope Not Hate-bashing, Nick Lowles wrote to UAF and demanded a public apology.

He even threatened UAF and gave it a deadline within which it was expected to apologise for accusing him of “personally of pandering to racism, spreading racist myths and writing material that would not be out of place on a BNP leaflet”.

If UAF didn’t comply, Lowles said at the time, he would

“pursue this matter further, up to and including legal action against those responsible for the document”. And one way he threatened to “pursue this matter further” was by raising the issue with the TUC.

As it happened, no apology was ever given by the ideological zealots of UAF.

Some Differences Between Hope Not Hate & Unite Against Fascism

Gerry Gable and Tony Benn

1a) Hope Not Hate: for a start, HnH was founded and originally led – or at least Searchlight was (Searchlight and Hope Not Hate split in 2011) – by an out-and-out communist.

In other words, by a member of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) – Gerry Gable.

Nick Lowles himself was a member of various ultra-Leftist groups in the 1980s and 1990s (such as Anti-Fascist Action, Red Action and Socialist Organiser ).

This is not to say that all members or supporters of HnH are communists.

Many will be Trotskyists or “progressives”.

A very small number may even be apolitical. However, what matters with all political groups (as with the EDL and the Conservative Party) is not the political and personal nature of every single member, but the leadership and the broad ideologies they follow.

1b) UAF: whereas Searchlight was connected to the CPGB in the early days, UAF is literally the Socialist Workers Party (SWP).

UAF is not just “strongly connected to the SWP”, as some have put it. UAF is simply a SWP front.

Even the leaders of UAF couldn’t possibly deny that (even if they wouldn’t use the word “front”).

Because the SWP is Trotskyist, then that means that UAF is Trotskyist too.

2a) Hope Not Hate: because of its broad communist sympathies (or, I should say, its commitment to communist parties and the Labour Party), HnH is far less extreme than UAF.

For example, it doesn’t have a specific ideological commitment to street violence (as well as violence generally) as the SWP-UAF has.

This will partly explain why HnH is more closely connected to the Labour Party and the Daily Mirror than UAF is.

2b) UAF: Trotskyists such as UAF have a political fetish for violence.

It’s actually written into Trotskyist ideology and I don’t only mean its commitment to the mass violence which will occur during and after a revolution.

UAF, like all Trotskyist groups, believes in two mantras:

“By any means necessary” and “The ends justify the means.”

This explains everything about both the SWP and UAF: the violence, the “lies for justice”.

The support of Islamic misogyny, Islamist violence, Islamic terrorism, halal meat, single-sexed schools, FGM, the niqab and burqa, Muslim grooming gangs, the IRA, the PLO, Hamas, Hezbollah, Yusuf al-Qaradawi , the Muslim Brotherhood “revolution” in Egypt, the Sudanese Islamist genocide against Christians and black animists, etc ect

Beginning to get the picture ?

Anything goes if it works against capitalism or the West (which more or less fuse in the minds of Trotskyists).

3a) Hope Not Hate: the “class structure” of HnH is overwhelmingly middle class.

However, as I said earlier about its apolitical members, there will of course be a handful of working class supporters and members too.

Communist groups have always been more closely connected to the working class than Trotskyist groups.

Indeed it would be silly to deny that in the first half of the twentieth century, and to some extent after, there were many working-class communists and members of communist parties.

(All the way up to Arthur Scargill in the 1970s and 1980s.)

However, compared to non-Leftist working class, they still made up a small percentage of that class. Despite that, HnH doesn’t even have that small percentage any more either.

3b) UAF: Unite Against Fascism is almost completely middle class.

In fact, when it comes to the SWP, the higher you go up the hierarchy the more likely the members and leaders will be upper-middle class, rather than middle class (or members of the much-hated, by Trots, petitebourgeoisie).

Though many British communists have also been upper-middle class too, it seems that Trotskyist groups have a penchant for attracting extremely posh and privileged people.

(Two members of the current SWP Central Committee are descendents of 19th century Lords.)

From experience, I don’t think I’ve ever met an activist of the SWP, or other Trotskyist groups, who wasn’t posh and who didn’t have that obligatory and often fake Estuary English glottal-stop accent.

(They all literally sounded as if they all came from exactly the same class and exactly the same place.)

Again, as with HnH, there are no doubt a handful of working class members of UAF and the SWP.

They may well clean the homes of the leadership and bow to their Soviet masters by trying to prove that they are completely Politically Correct and have absolutely no impure or Politically incorrect thoughts about Trotskyism, Marxism, Communism, or even the 100 Million deaths it was responsible for in the last Century, and the untold misery and suffering that this evil heinous ideology has wrought upon Mankind.

Hope not hate

Anti Fascist Member Jailed for Malicious Harassment of Nationalist Woman

Left Wing Anti Fascist Sicko made Facebook sex pictures threat to woman who rejected him when she realised he was a left wing Marxist weirdo.

Hope not hate

Marxist left wing Anti Fascist sicko Jason Prat, 44, jailed after victim left suffering panic attacks and depression following harassment and evil Anti Fascist Facebook campaign of hate.

Hope not hate

A jilted left wing Anti Fascist Marxist monster who was found out by a lover that he was a sick left wing Marxist Anti Fascist Anti British sicko, threatened to send explicit photos of her to her children, has been jailed for 12 weeks.

Anti Fascist member Jason Pratt, 44, used the “power” he had over his victim because he knew she had previously been involved in making videos, a court heard.

He had created male fake facebook profiles along with Anti Fascist female profiles to contact his ex-lover, 42, who was left suffering from depression and panic attacks after being targeted, threatened, and called a racist and a fascist by the Anti Fascist Anti British Jason Pratt.

Unemployed dole scrounging left wing Marxist Pratt, of Kent Road, Oldham, had previously been found guilty of harassment following a trial at Oldham magistrates court.

As well as being jailed, he was also banned indefinitely from contacting his victim and placed on a restraining order not to contact any females at all on Social Media, he was considered such a danger as a left wing Anti Fascist Marxist.

Judge David Rogers said:

“You harassed the complainant over a three-month period and used social networks constantly in a threatening manner to get her to re-engage with you and to renounce her good upbringing within the Patriotic British Community of proud Nationalist people.

“There are a number of aggravating features in this case.

“You sought to use dozens of sick Anti Fascist Facebook profiles to get in touch with her, you also found a link to a pornographic site and made use of that. You either involved or threatened to involve others, sending the link to the woman’s friends and her sister, insinuating that her children might get to see the photos. You used the power you had over her by the knowledge of those photos.”

Susan Stanley, prosecuting, said the defendant and victim had known each other from childhood and got back in contact again in June/July 2012 through Facebook, but she had no idea he was an Anti Fascist left wing politically correct Marxist Anti British traitor, as she termed it.

They eventually met up and the victim travelled to Pratt’s home where they had sex.

Yet the mum immediately regretted the sexual liaison with this very unpleasant unclean man and told the Anti Fascist she did not want to see him again, he repulsed her, including his sick left wing Anti British views which she instinctively knew were wrong and evil.

Soon afterwards she began receiving ‘‘creepy’ left wing type messages from the Stalinist Anti British Anti Fascist weirdo, saying he loved her and wanted to be with her, and wanted her to embrace Communism and Stalinism.

As a result she ‘unfriended’ him on Facebook and changed her mobile phone number.

But she continued to receive a “large number” of messages from Pratt who had set up fake Facebook profiles with names like “Slatfascism” to send messages to her and her adult children. He also sent his victim a link to an x-rated explicit video and insinuated that if she did not have sex with him again he would send photos to family members and tell them that she had joined an Anti Fascist organisation, which would of brought deep shame on her to be thought of by her family members to be connected with these vile foul awful sick people.

Francis Redford, defending, said Pratt, who had two previous convictions for Anti Fascist Anti British harassment, accepted sending the link and that it would have caused her upset.

“He regrets that and understands that he has problems with relationships,’’ Mr Redford said. “He suffers from depression and Anti Fascist multicultural left wing Anti British delusions and also has alcohol issues because he knows deep down that it is wrong and shameful.

He feels less than a real man and only joined the Anti Fascists because he just wanted to be accepted, and he knew that the Anti Fascists seek out people like him to join their ranks, societies dropouts and misfits. He recognises that he needs help.”

Pratt was dragged from the dock sobbing and shouting

“they told me to do it, the Anti Fascists made me do it, i am not one of them any more, i am sorry, i was wrong to do this, i know that now, please help me, help me”

The Labour Party Must Clean House of Marxist Anti Fascist Political Correctness

The Daily Bale

The Labour Party Must Clean House & Clean Up.   The British People are sick to the core of left wing politically correct Anti British Anti Fascist Marxists and Communist Militant P.C thugs and bullies.

political-correctness1

The left wing P.C race hate stirring, Anti British culture trashing, white hating, oppressors of freedom of speech and politically correct manipulation, intimidation and bullying of the British People must stop and the people responsible for this held to account, named and where proven to be malicious in intent – then they must be prosecuted and an example made.

  • Former prime minster has predicted Ed Miliband will lose general election
  • Issued most outspoken assessment of Labour leader to date in interview
  • Indicated he believes Mr Miliband has deserted political centre and made Labour a ‘traditional Left-wing party’ leaving the Tories likely to win 
  • Labour’s lead in polls has evaporated.

The Evil of Left Wing Political Correctness and the apologists of terrorism and paedophilia and all that is so very wrong within our society right now all summed up in the Marxist Groups and Gangs within the U.K that call themselves Anti Fascists.

Labour must rid itself of these vile hangers on who say that they speak on behalf of the general working man and the old original Labour values.

Freedom of speech has now come to the top of public opinion in combating and confronting the evil of terrorism and our common will to never allow terrorism and violence or the use of threats to take away our freedom to be who we are, to say what we think, and the ability to laugh at each other whilst keeping our humanity and our acceptance of each others differences without the wish to harm each other or to condemn each other because of those differences.

Daily Bale

But the encouragement of division and hatred has been going on right under our noses for a long time by those who claim to represent equality, but who in actual fact breed only division and inequality, hatred and suspicion, intimidation and bullying, manipulation and oppression, suppression of freedom of speech and politically correct tyranny and evil.

By doing what they have been doing, they have excused evil acts and acted as apologists for outrages and atrocities, and they have given the green light for innocent people to be attacked and killed by those who hate us and want to do us harm.

Who are these people who have brought this country to its moral knees ?

The left wing politically correct Marxist Militant Anti British Anti Fascists.

The Labour Party must disassociate itself from all Anti Fascist politically correct Marxist groups and join hands with the Patriotic Nationalists in rebuilding our Society and overcoming tyranny and evil.

satan

THE TRUTH IS OUT !

The Daily Bale brings your attention to the massive left wing Marxist scam that the left wing politically correct so called Anti Fascists use against the people to gain control of your thoughts and your freedom of speech, by pretending to use ‘morality’ as their claim to righteousness and authenticity.

By using the perception of morality, and then terming it as (Political Correctness) they then use that to shame, bully, intimidate and manipulate and force their own way, and their own left wing political agenda, by silencing any opposition or questioning of their point of view, by calling you a Racist or a Fascist if you so much as question these evil people.

They get away with it by keeping you continuously on the defensive.

Think about it – if you are being labelled as a Racist or a Fascist, then your first reaction is to defend yourself, because the majority of people are appalled by those terms, and the social stigma attached to those labels.

Are you beginning to get the picture now ?

This takes away your fundamental human right to question or to give opinion towards anything you do not agree with, or to even laugh at what you find amusing and funny.

This is the cause of hatred and has bred the fear within our society to even mention certain things, and has vilified the innocent and made excuses for the evil and wrong.

It has killed community spirit and taken away our right to recognise our differences whilst accepting our humanity within those differences and to be able to share those differences without fear or harm, whether agreed or disagreed about our differences and most importantly to be able to laugh at our differences.

my-free-speech

But let us look more closely at the people throwing those disgusting terms and labels at everybody else, why they are doing it, and what does it really says about the people doing it.

The people doing it are almost always left wing and self righteous in attitude. They are doing it to shame, bully, intimidate and manipulate the other person or person’s into following the same twisted thought process, and they try to make the individual feel false shame and guilt so that the individual falls in quickly to the left wing politically correct agenda, whilst the politically correct criminals themselves project a perceived false moral high ground and thus deceptively prove themselves to be morally right.

This is nothing more than one sided unequal undemocratic politically correct fascist bullying.

The overall percentage of politically correct left wing Anti British Marxists have been shamed and brainwashed themselves by the same sick and evil politically correct Anti British Marxist ideology that they are now pushing themselves – they just don’t realise that this is why they are doing it.

But this is all they have in life and feel some kind of twisted belonging amongst other brainwashed victims of politically correct propaganda and lies – even though they know deep down in the core of their souls when they question themselves truly, that what they are doing is so wrong and bordering on evil.

This in itself makes them even more angry and even more confused about themselves, this is why we have so many angry young people within Society these days who have lost a sense of worth and hope, pride and true belonging amongst other people and their community and a loss of pride and belonging within their own Nation.

But, this is where the whole rotten disgusting false morality of Political Correctness falls flat on its face, and the REAL racists and fascists are exposed for the shameful and immoral evil people they really are.

Logic tells you very plainly, that you have to recognise differences in people in the first place to then go on and accuse others of doing the very thing that you yourself recognise which is differences of Race or Religion.

The majority of us do not see differences and we just see other people or other human beings just the same as every other human being on this planet.

But the Politically Correct left wing racists actually pick up on differences and then go on to accuse other people of what they themselves see, which is differences in other people.

THAT IS RACISM !

The politically correct racists and fascists then use the differences that they see to then go on and falsely accuse others of racism, and thus shaming people into submission and keeping them quiet and preventing any questioning whatsoever as to the moral foundation of what they are doing or what they actually stand for – which in this case is the squashing of freedom of speech and politically correct fascist left wing domination of all areas of society by P.C bullying.

It thus becomes a dictatorial order of –

“conform to our way of seeing things, or be branded a racist or a fascist”

THIS IS FASCISM !

 

Please visit the Joshua Bonehill Official Website for more info.

Joshua Bonehill

Joshua Bonehill Official Website

http://joshuabonehill.co.uk/

List of Student Unions.

University of Birmingham Guild of Students

Cardiff University Students’ Union

De Montfort University

Teviot Row House

Glasgow University Union

Heriot-Watt University

Imperial College London

Keele University

Leeds University Union

University College London Union.

MMUnion

Newcastle University Students’ Union

Open University

University of Plymouth

Queen’s University Belfast

University of Reading

Swansea University Students’ Union

University of Teesside

University of Warwick Students’ Union

University of York

 

Terror in Paris Division in Britain Fear of Attacks Freedom of Speech Unity Liberty

unite against fascism

The Evil of Left Wing Political Correctness and the apologists of terrorism and paedophilia and all that is so very wrong within our society right now.

Freedom of speech has now come to the top of public opinion in combating and confronting the evil of terrorism and our common will to never allow terrorism and violence or the use of threats to take away our freedom to be who we are, to say what we think, and the ability to laugh at each other whilst keeping our humanity and our acceptance of each others differences without the wish to harm each other or to condemn each other because of those differences.

But the encouragement of division and hatred has been going on right under our noses for a long time by those who claim to represent equality, but who in actual fact breed only division and inequality, hatred and suspicion, intimidation and bullying, manipulation and oppression, suppression of freedom of speech and politically correct tyranny and evil.

By doing what they have been doing, they have excused evil acts and acted as apologists for outrages and atrocities, and they have given the green light for innocent people to be attacked and killed by those who hate us and want to do us harm.

Who are these people who have brought this country to its moral knees ?

The left wing politically correct Marxist Militant Anti British Anti Fascists.

THE TRUTH IS OUT !

The Daily Bale brings your attention to the ‘massive left wing Marxist scam’ that the left wing politically correct so called Anti Fascists use against the people to gain control of your thoughts and your freedom of speech, by pretending to use ‘morality’ as their claim to righteousness and authenticity.

By using the perception of morality, and then terming it as ‘Political Correctness’ they then use that to shame, bully, intimidate and manipulate and force their own way, and their own left wing political agenda, by silencing any opposition or questioning of their point of view, by calling you a ‘racist’ or a ‘fascist’ if you so much as question these evil people.

They get away with it by keeping you continuously on the defensive.

Think about it – if you are being labelled as a racist or a fascist, then your first reaction is to defend yourself, because the majority of people are appalled by those terms, and the social stigma attached to those labels.

Are you beginning to get the picture now ?

This takes away your fundamental human right to question or to give opinion towards anything you do not agree with, or to even laugh at what you find amusing and funny.

This is what has bred the fear within our society to even mention certain things, and has vilified the innocent and made excuses for the evil and wrong.

It has killed community spirit and taken away our right to recognise our differences whilst accepting our humanity within those differences and to be able to share those differences without fear or harm, whether agreed or disagreed about our differences and most importantly to be able to laugh at our differences.

my-free-speech

But let us look more closely at the people throwing those disgusting terms and labels at everybody else, why they are doing it, and what does it really says about the people doing it.

The people doing it are almost always left wing and self righteous in attitude. They are doing it to shame, bully, intimidate and manipulate the other person or person’s into following the same twisted thought process, and they try to make the individual feel false shame and guilt so that the individual falls in quickly to the left wing politically correct agenda, whilst the politically correct weirdos themselves project a perceived ‘moral’ high ground and thus deceptively ‘prove’ themselves to be morally right.

The overall percentage of politically correct left wing weirdos have been shamed and brainwashed themselves by the same sick and evil ideology that they are now pushing themselves – they just dont realise that this is why they are doing it.

But, this is where the whole rotten disgusting false morality of Political Correctness falls flat on its face, and the ‘real’ racists and ‘fascists’ are exposed for the shameful and immoral evil people they really are.

Logic tells you very plainly, that you have to recognise ‘differences’ in people in the first place to then go on and accuse others of doing the very thing that you yourself ‘recognise’ which is ‘differences’ of race.

The majority of us do not see ‘differences’ and we just see other ‘people’ or other human beings just the same as every other human being on this planet. But the Politically Correct left wing racists actually pick up on ‘differences’ and then go on to accuse other people of what they themselves see, which is ‘differences’ in other people.

THAT IS RACISM !

The politically correct racists and fascists then use the ‘differences’ that they see to then go on and falsely accuse others of racism, and thus shaming people into submission and keeping them quiet and preventing any questioning whatsoever as to the moral foundation of what they are doing or what they actually stand for – which in this case is the squashing of freedom of speech and politically correct fascist left wing domination of all areas of society by P.C bullying.

It thus becomes a dictatorial order of either –

“conform to our way of seeing things, or be branded a racist or a fascist”

THIS IS FASCISM !

General Election 2015: who will win. Daily Bale Forecast Prediction Election U.K

Image

The Daily Bale

General Election 2015: who will win? Daily Bale Predictions and Forecast. Conservative Ukip Coalition outcome. Labour becomes 3rd Party outsider just in front of Liberal Democrats.

Who will be Prime Minister – and why?

Right now, David Cameron is looking more likely. Not because he’s a genius, but because the odds are stacked so heavily in the Conservatives favour – but only with a Ukip Coalition partner Nigel Farage.

It’s very close, and this could change to an all out Conservative majority.

What will be their majority?

Conservative 41%

Ukip 37%

Labour 18%

Lib Dem 4%

Who will be the star of the campaign?

Most likely somebody not even in the campaign, but somebody who talks about issues that the main Parties fear to talk about because of left wing politically correct bullying, manipulation and intimidation, but nevertheless topics that the majority of the British people are discussing anyway and want implemented or solved. The most talked about popular and outspoken British Nationalist at the moment would be somebody like Joshua Bonehill.

http://joshuabonehill.co.uk/

Labour Party

What will be the big issues?

Immigration, the economy, debt, cost of living, Jobs for the British, crime and pulling out of the E.U.

Any surprises?

Always. Election campaigns are defined by what goes wrong.

Could Ukip Win outright ?

Judging by growing public mood – yes.  But not the 2015 Election, maybe the 2019-20 Elections.

Could somebody else be in the running after 2015 ?

Up and coming outspoken and stern Nationalists like the above mentioned Joshua Bonehill are tipped for future big things and possible Premiership one day, but his age and experience is a consideration at the moment obviously.

A lot of people are for the idea of a strong Nationalist leader in the future, and already with people like Joshua Bonehill emerging at a still relatively young age, then it’s certain that he will play a big part in the future of British Politics.

 

General Election 2015. Labour Party. Left Wing Hypocrisy Racism and Fascism

unite against fascism

 

Labour Party Hypocrisy and Left Wing Double Standards. Left Wing Responsible for Political Correctness Anti Fascist Anti British Marxist Subculture of Weird Left Wing Politically Correct Crackpots and Sickos Brainwashed by Marxist Fruitcakes and Drop outs.

As the left/right competition for immigration rhetoric on the airwaves heats up, you can’t tell ’em apart. It’s only Ukip and the Nationalists that are called racist, and all the ‘Racist’ rhetoric always seems to come from the left wing.

Of course we all know why that is.

The far left wing Marxists who have infiltrated the Labour Party and their cohorts the Anti Fascist Anti British storm troopers like ‘Hope Not Hate’ and ‘Unite Against Fascism’ gangs, are actually Communists.

We all know what Communist ideologies do within their regimes when they obtain power.

They establish extreme forms of dictatorship and classify anybody who does not tow the Party line as being ‘Politically incorrect’ – but within normal democracies like the U.K they just call you ‘Fascist and Racist’ to try to shame, bully, manipulate and intimidate opponents into silence and submission.

But another interesting fact is that under Communist regimes, they do not tolerate Religion or Minorities having an identity or a say in the regime, and as in the old Soviet Union they usually just make them ‘disappear’ in an extreme form of left wing Fascist and Racist tyranny.

Labour is now actually starting to talk about immigration here in the U.K because it realises that the British people will not tolerate the swamping of our country any more with immigrants, that hypocritically the Labour Party caused in the first place. David Blunkett’s warning that an influx of Roma migrants could lead to riots in Britain should be taken very seriously. Yet when Nationalists like Joshua Bonehill talk about it, it’s classed as racism.

Labour Party

Proud Nationalist and Patriot Joshua Bonehill.

http://joshuabonehill.co.uk/

“Mr Blunkett should be admired for the courage he has shown by speaking so plainly on this issue just like our brave and courageous Nationalists like Joshua Bonehill.

Nigel Farage said “Of course the type of language Mr Blunkett has used I would have been utterly condemned for using,” And he’s right.

People like Nigel Farage and Joshua Bonehill are still being condemned today, and we are letting the left wing racist Marxists get away with it !

The left are running hard to catch up and talk about immigration and openly admitting their spectacular failure to manage our borders since 2004.  They are afraid for their northern Labour strongholds. Ukip is the official opposition in the north.

The Conservative party, whilst trying to detoxify itself with the green agenda, hugging hoodies and gay marriage, has also stepped up its language on immigration with a massive own goal with the immigration vans. They are afraid for their key marginal seats with supporters haemorrhaging to Ukip.

Some say that the vans should of been put to much better use, with guaranteed outcomes to the solution.

The Lib Dems squirm over the immigration vans, yet they’re in government and approved them. They wholly embrace the EU so cannot be part of the discussion. We know where they stand.

When Jack Straw said that Muslim women should abandon wearing the burqa because it was a “visible statement of separation and difference” he quickly backed down.

And again when he asked women to remove their veils at meetings in his constituency office, he was attacked but never called a racist.

When Ukip proposes the banning of any face coverings in public they are attacked, most recently by the defence minister Anna Soubry on BBC’s Question Time.  I think the ladies on the panel got together in the loo and said ‘let’s look good by attacking Farage’.  Soubry, briefed by No 10, was let loose as an attack dog. She looked very silly and very shrill.

The Conservatives spin a great line about “women should be free to wear what they want” – have they asked the men who are representatives of a ‘certain’ religion in the U.K what they think about that we wonder ?

Of course the left wing ignore that little gem too.

There is a very real threat in the U.K since our borders were opened to 450 million E.U immigrants. The fact that Blunkett is talking of the significant difficulties with the Roma population already in his constituency should be taken seriously by the likes of Cameron, Clegg and Miliband.

Channel 4 News with Romany journalist Jake Bowers. There was a new report out that showed there were already 200,000 Roma living in the UK.

Jake made the point that they have been here for 500 years and have never integrated. We agreed with him that there was a real problem if we couldn’t get our own Roma to integrate what chance did we have of the impending arrival of more?

As one commentator pointed out, those that are coming are illiterate, unhealthy, have scores of children and no proper roof over their heads – that was Isobel  Fonseca (aka Martin Amis’ wife), who has travelled with and written books about them. Has she ever been called a racist?

Yet, despite the tough words, is Mr Blunkett to support Ukip and Nationalists like Joshua Bonehill in explicitly opposing the opening of the doors of the U.K ?

The political class are trying to sweep this issue under the carpet but they should listen, act and stop the relaxing of border controls to all foreigners. The clock is ticking.

We wonder whether the Unite Against Fascism mob will turn up at Blunkett and Straw’s next public meeting or constituency surgery ? or will they just keep on attacking Farage and Bonehill ?

Hypocrisy any one ?

Why The Labour Party Will Not Win 2015 General Election

The Daily Bale

 

Mass immigration ruined Britain’s national identity and how Labour tried to destroy Britishness. Public mood changing fast, it is now seen to be Anti Social to be ‘known’ as ‘politically correct’ and to be a ‘lefty’ is seen as being a weirdo in some way and is viewed to be very suspect by the General Public.

Throughout the tenure of the last Labour government the Daily Bale in other forms along with others — while praising the huge contribution immigrants had made to this country in the past — attacked the laxity of what were supposed to be our border controls, they never existed as such.

It was clear the very nature of our society was being changed by a new kind of uncontrolled mass immigration — and without the British people ever having been asked whether they supported the policy.

Uncontrolled: Immigration surged under Labour

Labour arrogantly accused its critics of racism — though most of the incomers were white — and of scaremongering.

It claimed it had no choice but to open our borders to the nationals of ten mainly ex-Soviet bloc countries which joined the EU in 2004.

The truth was that — as other EU countries which restricted immigration from these states proved — it did have a choice.

Action: Home Secretary Theresa May has announced that the UK Border Agency will be split

Action: Home Secretary Theresa May has announced that the UK Border Agency will be split

Useless

The cynicism did not end there. Such, Labour claimed, was its commitment to ensuring that only people with a right to be in Britain could come here that in 2008 it set up the UK Border Agency. The truth, unfortunately, was very different.

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, has announced that the agency is being wound up next month precisely because it is useless, and the officials who ran it — rather like the borders they supposedly policed — were out of control.

Despite the strong threat from international terrorism, the evidence of eastern European criminal gangs infiltrating Britain, and our overburdened public and social services, 500,000 unchecked people were let in to Britain via Eurostar between 2007 and last year, while countless so-called students were just nodded through.

Though Labour clearly left the system in a shambles, it should be noted that it has taken almost two years for this Government to admit the mess our immigration procedures are in, and to do something about it.

So Mrs May’s department — and notably the Immigration Minister Damian Green — also have a case to answer.

They seemed unaware that their officials, too, were ordering the relaxation of controls. Yet while the Coalition has  been derelict, Labour was downright malign.

The game was given away in 2009 by Andrew Neather, a former Labour Home Office and Downing Street adviser, who revealed that mass immigration was a deliberate policy by the Left to change the social fabric of the country and to ‘rub the Right’s nose in diversity’.

This appalling policy was never discussed publicly because Labour strategists feared it would upset the party’s traditional white working-class support. For self-interested political reasons, the public could not possibly be consulted.

Political Correctness

Mass immigration gratified the Left in two ways that have inflicted enormous damage on our country. It furthered the bogus notion of multiculturalism — undermining national identity and common values, and preventing the successful integration of immigrant communities into the British cultural mainstream

Moreover, at a time of growing economic crisis, it added an enormous number of people to Labour’s client state.

Recent immigrants were grateful for their admission to the country, and for the costly safety net of the welfare state that was provided for them: a gratitude that, Labour hoped, would help it garner more votes at elections.

That aside, it is generally accepted that new arrivals to a country — who are often relatively impoverished — are more likely to vote for Leftish governments.

So although present ministers have much explaining to do, this cocktail of ideology and blatant gerrymandering is of the Left’s making.

In the interests of creating a society with which Leftist ideologues felt comfortable, and which would help shore up Labour’s vote at elections, the wishes of the vast majority of the British people, and their security, were ridden roughshod over.

The idea of multiculturalism was advanced with varying degrees of stealth over several decades by politicians, civil servants and council officials. Its doctrine was spread  in schools and in teacher-training colleges.

Self-hate: Former BBC Director General Greg Dyke slammed Britain's 'hideously white' mainstream culture

Self-hate: Former BBC Director General Greg Dyke slammed Britain’s ‘hideously white’ mainstream culture

Weak as it so often is, the Church of England appeared to welcome it, even though it posed a mortal threat to that institution. The BBC, never to be found wanting when political correctness was required, suppressed any debate about mass immigration, took the tenets of multiculturalism as its gospel and preached it to the nation.

Internationalism is one of the core principles of the Left. It abhors the nation state, which it sees as a foundry of bigotry, racism and aggressive nationalism.

The Left has always understood this: that if you manage to wreck a national culture and a national identity, you shatter the ties of history and nationhood forged over centuries.

Although there used to be patriotic Leftists — and there still are one or two — many in the New Labour project in the Nineties and Noughties were, effectively, self-hating Britons.

They tortured themselves with post-imperial guilt, wanted the country to lose its independence and be ruled by Brussels, and sought to have what a BBC executive called the ‘hideously white’ mainstream culture diluted by ‘diversity’.

Threat

This was immensely dangerous. In a world where even Trevor Phillips, the chairman of the Equality Commission, highlights the threat that multiculturalism poses to social cohesion, it is surprising it has taken ministers so long to become alert to this danger.

However one of them, at last, has. Eric Pickles, the Communities Secretary, has said that  the culture of the majority will once more be given pre-eminence in society.

This is utterly sensible and, indeed, indispensable if we wish for a coherent and settled society of shared values.

Social cohesion: Trevor Phillips

Social cohesion: Trevor Phillips

Shared values: Eric Pickles

Shared values: Eric Pickles

To promote — as opposed to tolerate — the practices of other cultures is to drive people into ghettos. It prevents integration and assimilation and causes strife in society between religious and social groups who find themselves gazing at one another suspiciously across the social divides created by multiculturalism.

Mr Pickles has specified what this assault on multiculturalism will mean. He has said that public bodies’ obsession with translating leaflets into all known languages — and spending a fortune in public money on doing so — should end.

Learning English is one of the fundamentals of grasping the British way of life.

He has argued that tolerance of the beliefs of others should not extend to disowning those of the majority.

He deplored the disciplining of Christian workers who wear crucifixes, and the recent decision to ban prayers before the meetings of a town council in Devon. He has called all these issues ‘the politics of division’, and he is right.

unite against fascism

Ludicrous evil nonsense of left wing politically correct weirdos, sickos and perverts.

 

In a society that remains more than 90 per cent indigenously British, it is ludicrous to be ashamed of national traditions, rooted in common values from a shared past.

And it is entirely right to expect those who come here to accept those values and traditions, and not be made — usually by mischievous, politically-motivated white liberals — to feel hostile towards them.

When even many atheists recognise the central importance of Christianity to the culture and institutions of our country — and I am one of them — it is offensive to the intellect as well as to the spiritual to seek to downgrade or marginalise that faith.

Our society needs an end to mass immigration.

This is not just because the parts of the country where immigrants most wish to settle are overcrowded, and the public services and infrastructure are cracking under the strain, or because we have 2.7  million unemployed.

It is principally because our national identity — founded on Christian values of tolerance and decency, and on a history of which we can be exceptionally proud — has been gravely injured by Britain’s Left-wing enemy within, and needs to recover from its wounds.

The best way to guarantee a harmonious future for all our people, of whatever racial background, is to make that culture strong again, and for us all to embrace it.